Technical Review Meeting Definition

As you can see from HubSpot’s example above, user manuals can get technically demanding, but the information within always needs to be presented in a way that’s easy to understand for any user, no matter their technical background. After they’re done, your fellow technical writer would provide you with feedback on what needs to be clarified in the document, if there are any missteps in the document, and so on. Technical review means detailed scrutiny ensuring a proposal or activity adheres to required standards and guidelines. The decision was made, with all FTR attendees completing a sign-of indicating their participation in the review and their agreement with the findings of the review team.

technical review meaning

However, the review process isn’t the same for all types of technical documentation. In addition, the purpose of FTR is to enable junior engineer to observe the analysis, design, coding and testing approach more closely. FTR also works to promote back up and continuity become familiar with parts of software they might not have seen otherwise. Actually, FTR is a class of reviews that include walkthroughs, inspections, round robin reviews and other small group technical assessments of software.

Tips for Improving Technical Documentation Accuracy

That’s why reviewers of user guides should concentrate on simplifying complex information and providing users with an excellent user experience. In other words, ample testing and usability reviews are needed to ensure that this type of document is comprehensible enough for the end-user. For instance, if the use of your product can in any way lead to personal injury or harm, it’s extremely important to have all the necessary warnings, disclaimers, and safety information in your technical documentation. Similarly, these experts can tell you if there are steps in your documentation that are missing because you’ve assumed something is common knowledge in the technical documentation. Their task is to check if the document is consistent with how the product works and if the instructions are in line with how the product team expects the user to interact with the software.

technical review meaning

A good way to do this is to have the documentation ready as soon as the product is ready for beta testing by early adopters. Finally, it’s always a good idea to have people outside of the company technical review meaning test the documentation before it becomes available to the public. Therefore, this is the part of the review process that might need a little more planning and a good amount of patience.

Technical Review – Static Testing:

Make sure that your documentation is reviewed by the right people who can make it more accurate and useful for your end-users. In an inefficient review process, documents are over-edited by experts of the same type, while also not getting enough attention from reviewers of other backgrounds. A chaotic review process won’t help you produce quality, accurate documentation.

technical review meaning

This second stage of the review process is extremely important because it’s where your document is checked for factual correctness and accuracy of information. The first round of reviews is usually handled internally by the technical writing team. This article will give you an overview of technical documentation review and guide you through creating your own review workflow.

Technical Review

We list many below, then combine them into one or more market-standard definitions.

technical review meaning

A policy of encouraging management to stay out of peer reviews encourages the peer review team to concentrate on the product being reviewed and not on the people or personalities involved. In the next few subsections, let’s examine the most common mistakes technical reviewers make and arm you with strategies to avoid them. Here are also two article about common mistakes in writing technical documentation and documentation mistakes developers should avoid. There are two philosophies about the vested interest of the inspectors in the product under review. On one hand, project personnel who have a vested interest in the work product under review have the most knowledge of the product and are motivated to find and fix defects. On the other hand, personnel from outside the project who do not have a vested interest in the work product bring objectivity and a fresh viewpoint to the technical peer review team.

Guide on how to hire software development team for your project

There’s no question that style is an important part in writing technical document. If all of the necessary information is there, reviewers can thoroughly test the documentation to see if it generates the desired results (successful deployment). It’s the quality of information and the usability of the rules and regulations outlined in the coding standard that counts.

  • Under the ADA, State and local governments, businesses, and nonprofit organizations that serve the public generally must allow service animals to accompany people with disabilities in all areas of the facility where the public is allowed to go.
  • Under the ADA, service animals must be harnessed, leashed, or tethered, unless the individual’s disability prevents using these devices or these devices interfere with the service animal’s safe, effective performance of tasks.
  • For example, in a hospital it usually would be inappropriate to exclude a service animal from areas such as patient rooms, clinics, cafeterias, or examination rooms.
  • Therefore, if reviewers become too focused on the stylistic choices of writers, greater mistakes could slip by unnoticed.
  • This is a major technical review and is sometimes called a PDR [Preliminary Design Review].

Product team reviews are carried out by software developers or other people involved in the development of the product. In this activity, the number of reviews and level of formality is tailored to the size and type of the project. For example, on a small traffic signal control system that is a COTS product, the number of reviews can be minimal [bi-weekly or monthly]. The meetings may be informal with the project manager and/or traffic engineer in a review of progress. The meeting should be followed up with a complete set of minutes that include all decisions, actions, and assignments. The minute taker, if needed, should follow up with the attendees to make sure the minutes are as complete as possible.

Related Definitions

Make arrangements, if necessary, for breakfast, lunch, dinner, and/or break refreshments. Unresolved action items from the previous reviews are carried over for continuing discussion and/or decisions. The Americans with Disabilities Act authorizes the Department of Justice (the Department) to provide technical assistance to individuals and entities that have rights or responsibilities under the Act. This document provides informal guidance to assist you in understanding the ADA and the Department’s regulations.

As you can imagine, reviewing requirements documentation involves a lot of cutting and simplifying, but the resulting document should help you design a great product more efficiently, so it’s worth the effort. The only experts at your company who can guarantee all legal requirements are being met are in your legal team, so make sure they have a look at your documentation and don’t publish it before they give their approval. Component level detailed design review is used to ensure that the detailed design is ready for implementation.

User login

This would be the time and place to monitor, review, and take action on both technical and project management metrics that were set up for the phase currently in progress. This might be a software design document or program source code, but use cases, business process definitions, test case specifications, and a variety of other technical documentation, may also be subject to technical review. So, if you haven’t already, take the time to codify and define every step, stakeholder, and deliverable in the documentation review process, and then share it with the people tasked with reviewing the documentation. In opposition to user manuals, coding standards are written by and for the development team working on software, meaning that the audience for this type of document has a high level of technical expertise. As we said in the introduction, all documentation needs to pass some sort of review before it’s published.